2009 Jeep Compass vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia K2700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia K2700 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 137 kg more than 2009 Jeep Compass.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Kia K2700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Compass (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Compass | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
| Make | Jeep | Kia |
| Model | Compass | K2700 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 2665 cc |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 94.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 97 mm | 95 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1530 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 60 L |
