2009 Jeep Compass vs. 2005 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 294 kg more than 2005 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Nissan Bluebird has automatic transmission and 2009 Jeep Compass has manual transmission. 2009 Jeep Compass will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Nissan Bluebird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Compass | 2005 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Compass | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1464 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1450 mm |