2009 Jeep Compass vs. 2005 Suzuki X2
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki X2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki X2 would be higher.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Suzuki X2 has automatic transmission and 2009 Jeep Compass has manual transmission. 2009 Jeep Compass will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Suzuki X2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Compass | 2005 Suzuki X2 | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Compass | X2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2650 mm |