2009 Jeep Compass vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Holden Epica would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (172 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2006 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Epica.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Compass. (224 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Compass | 2006 Holden Epica | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Compass | Epica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 224 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |