2009 Jeep Compass vs. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (110 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Compass (310 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (151 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 has automatic transmission and 2009 Jeep Compass has manual transmission. 2009 Jeep Compass will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Compass | 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 | |
| Make | Jeep | Smart |
| Model | Compass | Ultimate 112 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1570 mm |
