2009 Jeep Compass vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Compass. (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 257 kg more than 2009 Jeep Compass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (380 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Compass. (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Compass | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Jeep | Ford |
Model | Compass | Mustang |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Crossover | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 97 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1425 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.9 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.8 L/100km | 11.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 61 L |