2009 Jeep Compass vs. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo
To start off, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Jeep Compass would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 13 kg more than 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo (540 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 399 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Compass. (141 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Compass. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo has automatic transmission and 2009 Jeep Compass has manual transmission. 2009 Jeep Compass will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Compass | 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo | |
| Make | Jeep | Lamborghini |
| Model | Compass | Gallardo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Torque | 141 Nm | 540 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 97 mm | 92 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1380 kg |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.4 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
