2009 Jeep Compass vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Jeep Compass would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 128 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Cooper. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Compass (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Compass | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Jeep | Mini |
Model | Compass | Cooper |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Crossover | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 97 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2547 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.9 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.8 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 50 L |