2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1964 Singer Vogue III
To start off, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Singer Vogue III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Singer Vogue III would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 302 more horse power than 1964 Singer Vogue III. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1964 Singer Vogue III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 736 kg more than 1964 Singer Vogue III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Singer Vogue III. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1964 Singer Vogue III | |
Make | Jeep | Singer |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Vogue III |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 381 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1828 kg | 1092 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 47 L |