2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1983 Mazda 929
To start off, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 292 more horse power than 1983 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 678 kg more than 1983 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee (548 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1983 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 929 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 381 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 548 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1828 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2620 mm |