2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1994 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 298 kg more than 1994 Nissan Cima.
Because 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Nissan Cima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1994 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Cima |
Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 381 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1828 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1770 mm |