2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2004 Mazda MX

To start off, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda MX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda MX would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 2004 Mazda MX. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda MX.

Because 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda MX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee (548 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 341 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda MX. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda MX.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2004 Mazda MX
Make Jeep Mazda
Model Grand Cherokee MX
Year Released 2009 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5654 cc 2261 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 381 HP 160 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 548 Nm 207 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2760 mm