2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1268 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 2004 Mitsubishi Minica has manual transmission. 2004 Mitsubishi Minica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2004 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Minica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1978 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2350 mm |