2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2011 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2011 Nissan Leaf is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher.
Because 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Nissan Leaf. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2011 Nissan Leaf | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Leaf |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 381 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4445 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 2.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 2.2 L/100km |