2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2011 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2011 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 2011 Nissan X-Trail. (137 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan X-Trail.

Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee (548 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan X-Trail. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan X-Trail. 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 2011 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2011 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2011 Nissan X-Trail
Make Jeep Nissan
Model Grand Cherokee X-Trail
Year Released 2009 2011
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5654 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 381 HP 137 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 548 Nm 198 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4640 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2640 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 14.7 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 65 L