2009 Jeep Patriot vs. 1952 Triumph TR2
To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph TR2 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Patriot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Patriot (156 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1952 Triumph TR2. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph TR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Triumph TR2 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Patriot. (141 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1952 Triumph TR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Patriot. 2009 Jeep Patriot has automatic transmission and 1952 Triumph TR2 has manual transmission. 1952 Triumph TR2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Patriot will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Patriot | 1952 Triumph TR2 | |
Make | Jeep | Triumph |
Model | Patriot | TR2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |