2009 Jeep Patriot vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Patriot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Patriot (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Patriot weights approximately 223 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Patriot (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Patriot will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Patriot | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Jeep | Triumph |
Model | Patriot | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 64 L |