2009 Jeep Patriot vs. 1966 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Patriot (148 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1966 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 1966 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 1966 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Patriot | 1966 Plymouth Valiant | |
| Make | Jeep | Plymouth |
| Model | Patriot | Valiant |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 100 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
