2009 Jeep Patriot vs. 1968 Mazda 1000
To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda 1000 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Patriot (148 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1968 Mazda 1000. (57 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda 1000.
Because 1968 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Jeep Patriot has automatic transmission and 1968 Mazda 1000 has manual transmission. 1968 Mazda 1000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Patriot will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Patriot | 1968 Mazda 1000 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Patriot | 1000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 57 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |