2009 Jeep Patriot vs. 1970 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Patriot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Patriot (156 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1970 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 1970 ZAZ 966.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Patriot (141 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Patriot will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Patriot | 1970 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Jeep | ZAZ |
| Model | Patriot | 966 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 141 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 54.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
