2009 Jeep Patriot vs. 1972 Lotus 72

To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Lotus 72. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Lotus 72 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1972 Lotus 72 (444 HP) has 296 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Patriot. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Lotus 72 should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Patriot.

Because 1972 Lotus 72 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Lotus 72. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Jeep Patriot has automatic transmission and 1972 Lotus 72 has manual transmission. 1972 Lotus 72 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Patriot will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jeep Patriot 1972 Lotus 72
Make Jeep Lotus
Model Patriot 72
Year Released 2009 1972
Engine Type electric in-line
Horse Power 148 HP 444 HP
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]