2009 Jeep Patriot vs. 1996 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Patriot. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Patriot.
Because 1996 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Patriot | 1996 Mazda RX-7 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Patriot | RX-7 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | electric | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 238 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
