2009 Jeep Patriot vs. 1997 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Falcon would be higher. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Falcon (205 HP) has 57 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Patriot. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Patriot.
Because 1997 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Patriot | 1997 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Jeep | Ford |
| Model | Patriot | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 205 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
