2009 Jeep Patriot vs. 2001 Toyota Progress NC 300
To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Progress NC 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Progress NC 300 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Progress NC 300 (213 HP) has 65 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Patriot. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Progress NC 300 should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Patriot.
Because 2001 Toyota Progress NC 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Toyota Progress NC 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Patriot | 2001 Toyota Progress NC 300 | |
| Make | Jeep | Toyota |
| Model | Patriot | Progress NC 300 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 213 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
