2009 Jeep Patriot vs. 2003 Mazda 6

To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Patriot (156 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.

Because 2009 Jeep Patriot is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jeep Patriot. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Patriot. (141 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Patriot.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jeep Patriot 2003 Mazda 6
Make Jeep Mazda
Model Patriot 6
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 156 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 141 Nm 181 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 95.5 mm 83.1 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors