2009 Jeep Patriot vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Jeep Patriot. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Jeep Patriot would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP) has 120 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Patriot. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Patriot.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Jeep Patriot. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Patriot | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
| Make | Jeep | Cadillac |
| Model | Patriot | ATS |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 268 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
