2009 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1966 Seat 1500
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1966 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 883 kg more than 1966 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Seat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Wrangler | 1966 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Jeep | Seat |
| Model | Wrangler | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3778 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2043 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2660 mm |
