2009 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,777 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (196 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1031 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Zastava 102. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Wrangler | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Jeep | Zastava |
| Model | Wrangler | 102 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 3777 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 196 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2160 mm |
