2009 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1983 Audi 4000
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (172 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1983 Audi 4000. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi 4000.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (296 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2009 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Wrangler | 1983 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Jeep | Audi |
Model | Wrangler | 4000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.5 mm | 79.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.7 mm | 86.4 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2550 mm |