2009 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1983 Mazda 929
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1983 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 893 kg more than 1983 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Wrangler | 1983 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Wrangler | 929 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3778 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 321 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2043 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2620 mm |