2009 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1983 Pontiac 1000

To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Pontiac 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Pontiac 1000 would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (172 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1983 Pontiac 1000. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1983 Pontiac 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1083 kg more than 1983 Pontiac 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Pontiac 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (296 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Pontiac 1000. (109 Nm). This means 2009 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Pontiac 1000. 2009 Jeep Wrangler has automatic transmission and 1983 Pontiac 1000 has manual transmission. 1983 Pontiac 1000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Wrangler will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: