2009 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1989 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,777 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 480 kg more than 1989 Mercury Sable.
Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Wrangler | 1989 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Jeep | Mercury |
| Model | Wrangler | Sable |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1989 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2777 cc | 2513 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2700 mm |
