2009 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01

To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 943 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.

Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jeep Wrangler 1996 Mazda RX-01
Make Jeep Mazda
Model Wrangler RX-01
Year Released 2009 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3778 cc 2615 cc
Engine Type V dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 202 HP 217 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 8500 RPM
Torque 321 Nm 220 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 2043 kg 1100 kg
Vehicle Length 4410 mm 4060 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1800 mm 1250 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2350 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 85 L 55 L