2009 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 207 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Wrangler | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Wrangler | Challenger |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3778 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2043 kg | 1836 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2730 mm |