2009 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1996 Proton 400

To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 3,776 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (196 HP) has 129 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 815 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Proton 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (315 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jeep Wrangler 1996 Proton 400
Make Jeep Proton
Model Wrangler 400
Year Released 2009 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3776 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 196 HP 67 HP
Torque 315 Nm 123 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Diesel
Drive Type 4WD Front
Vehicle Weight 1950 kg 1135 kg
Vehicle Length 4760 mm 4280 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1810 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2510 mm