2009 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1998 Panoz Q9
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Panoz Q9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Panoz Q9 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz Q9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Panoz Q9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Panoz Q9 (678 Nm) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. (296 Nm). This means 1998 Panoz Q9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Wrangler | 1998 Panoz Q9 | |
Make | Jeep | Panoz |
Model | Wrangler | Q9 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 678 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 59 L |