2009 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2004 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Proton Gen-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Proton Gen-2 would be higher. At 2,777 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (175 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (411 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Wrangler | 2004 Proton Gen-2 | |
Make | Jeep | Proton |
Model | Wrangler | Gen-2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 2777 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 411 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2610 mm |