2009 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,777 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (196 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. (315 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Wrangler | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Wrangler | Epica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3777 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 196 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 315 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.5 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |