2009 Kia Carnival vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2009 Kia Carnival is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,902 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Carnival is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Carnival (142 HP @ 8800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Carnival should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Carnival weights approximately 1278 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Carnival (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Carnival will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Carnival | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Carnival | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2902 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 8800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2220 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2210 mm |