2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 1952 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Maserati A6G (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2009 Kia Cee'd. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 890 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G.
Because 1952 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Cee'd | 1952 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Kia | Maserati |
Model | Cee'd | A6G |
Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 550 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2290 mm |