2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 1952 Toyota SA
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Toyota SA would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1952 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1952 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 270 kg more than 1952 Toyota SA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Kia Cee'd | 1952 Toyota SA | |
| Make | Kia | Toyota |
| Model | Cee'd | SA |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2410 mm |
