2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,975 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 841 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Cee'd (187 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Cee'd | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Kia | Suzuki |
Model | Cee'd | Fronte |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 1975 cc | 358 cc |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1341 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2060 mm |