2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 1964 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 540 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Kia Cee'd | 1964 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Kia | Nissan |
| Model | Cee'd | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1188 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2290 mm |
