2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 1971 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 1,990 cc, 1971 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 NSU Ro 80 (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (108 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 2009 Kia Cee'd. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 189 kg more than 1971 NSU Ro 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 NSU Ro 80 (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (137 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1971 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Kia Cee'd.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Kia Cee'd | 1971 NSU Ro 80 | |
| Make | Kia | NSU |
| Model | Cee'd | Ro 80 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1971 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1990 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 188 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1399 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 82 L |
