2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 1972 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (108 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 489 kg more than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Cee'd (137 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Cee'd | 1972 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cee'd | Colt |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1399 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2360 mm |