2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 1979 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 354 kg more than 1979 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1979 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Kia Cee'd | 1979 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Kia | Nissan |
| Model | Cee'd | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1399 kg | 1045 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2660 mm |
