2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 618 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Cee'd | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Kia | Volvo |
Model | Cee'd | 66 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |