2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass (123 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (108 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2009 Kia Cee'd. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 79 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass (203 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (137 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Kia Cee'd.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Cee'd | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Kia | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cee'd | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1399 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2680 mm |