2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 1993 Mazda 626

To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (120 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 626. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mazda 626 weights approximately 7 kg more than 2009 Kia Cee'd.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Mazda 626 (172 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (154 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1993 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Kia Cee'd.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Kia Cee'd 1993 Mazda 626
Make Kia Mazda
Model Cee'd 626
Year Released 2009 1993
Body Type Hatchback Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1591 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 120 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 154 Nm 172 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 77.1 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85.4 mm 86 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1263 kg 1270 kg
Vehicle Length 4240 mm 4600 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 2620 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 53 L 65 L