2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 1998 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,975 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1998 Mazda Midge. (67 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 375 kg more than 1998 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Cee'd (187 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Cee'd | 1998 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Cee'd | Midge |
Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1975 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1341 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |